Archive for February, 2009

Suetonius and the New Testament #2 Expulsion of Jews

Thursday, February 19th, 2009

My previous entry was the last of the series involving Tacitus, but the first of a shorter series about Suetonius and the New Testament.  In the book of Acts 18:1-3 it is recorded that the Jews were expelled during the reign of Claudius.

After this, Paul left Athens and went to Corinth. There he met a Jew named Aquila, a native of Pontus, who had recently come from Italy with his wife Priscilla, because Claudius had ordered all the Jews to leave Rome. Paul went to see them, and because he was a tentmaker as they were, he stayed and worked with them.

A similar event is noted by Suetonius when he is listing a series of actions taken by Claudius at various points in his reign.

Claudius 25:

He banished from Rome all the Jews, who were continually making disturbances at the instigation of one Chrestus.

Whom this Chrestus is has been debated back and forth for a long time.  Obviously some identify him as Christ, others say it is some unknown person.  In either case Suetonius was aware of Christians as he mentions them when he talks about Nero.

Nero 16:

He likewise inflicted punishments on the Christians, a sort of people who held a new and impious superstition.

Tacitus and the New Testament Part 7

Thursday, February 12th, 2009

In the Book of Acts it is recorded that there was a large famine over the whole world (which in ancient times normally constituted the Roman Empire). Acts states that this occurred during the reign of Claudius.

Acts 11:27-30

And in these days prophets came from Jerusalem to Antioch. Then one of them, named Agabus, stood up and showed by the Spirit that there was going to be a great famine throughout all the world, which also happened in the days of Claudius Caesar. Then the disciples, each according to his ability, determined to send relief to the brethren dwelling in Judea. This they also did, and sent it to the elders by the hands of Barnabas and Saul.

Josephus mentions a famine in Judea during the reign of Claudius which Queen Helena helped to ease.

Antiquities 20.2.5

Now her coming was of very great advantage to the people of Jerusalem; for whereas a famine did oppress them at that time, and many people died for want of what was necessary to procure food withal, queen Helena sent some of her servants to Alexandria with money to buy a great quantity of corn, and others of them to Cyprus, to bring a cargo of dried figs. And as soon as they were come back, and had brought those provisions, which was done very quickly, she distributed food to those that were in want of it, and left a most excellent memorial behind her of this benefaction, which she bestowed on our whole nation. And when her son Izates was informed of this famine, he sent great sums of money to the principal men in Jerusalem. However, what favors this queen and king conferred upon our city Jerusalem shall be further related hereafter.

Josephus goes on to give a more precise date of the famine.

Antiquities 20.5.2

Then came Tiberius Alexander as successor to Fadus; he was the son of Alexander the alabarch of Alexandria, which Alexander was a principal person among all his contemporaries, both for his family and wealth: he was also more eminent for his piety than this his son Alexander, for he did not continue in the religion of his country. Under these procurators that great famine happened in Judea, in which queen Helena bought corn in Egypt at a great expense, and distributed it to those that were in want, as I have related already.

Fadus governed Judæa from 44 to 46 and Tiberius Alexander from 46 to 48, so the famine likely lasted a number of years.

According to Tacitus a famine occurred in the year 51.

The Annals 12.43

Several prodigies occurred in that year. Birds of evil omen perched on the Capitol; houses were thrown down by frequent shocks of earthquake, and as the panic spread, all the weak were trodden down in the hurry and confusion of the crowd. Scanty crops too, and consequent famine were regarded as a token of calamity. Nor were there merely whispered complaints; while Claudius was administering justice, the populace crowded round him with a boisterous clamour and drove him to a corner of the forum, where they violently pressed on him till he broke through the furious mob with a body of soldiers. It was ascertained that Rome had provisions for no more than fifteen days, and it was through the signal bounty of heaven and the mildness of the winter that its desperate plight was relieved. And yet in past days Italy used to send supplies for the legions into distant provinces, and even now it is not a barren soil which causes distress. But we prefer to cultivate Africa and Egypt, and trust the life of the Roman people to ships and all their risks.

Note here are Tacitus claims that the famine was due to a lack of precipitation. He goes on to say that Rome imported most of its grain from Africa and Egypt, which would indicate that those locations had suffered from the lack of precipitation.

Suetonius also mentions a famine that covered several years.

The Twelve Caesars: Claudius 19 (My edition of this work has this passage in 18, but the online edition has it at 19)

During a scarcity of provisions, occasioned by bad crops for several successive years, he was stopped in the middle of the forum by the mob, who so abused him, at the same time pelting him with fragments of bread, that he had some difficulty in escaping into the palace by a back door. He therefore used all possible means to bring provisions to the city, even in winter. He proposed to the merchants a sure profit, by indemnifying them against any loss that might befall them by storms at sea; and granted great privileges to those who built ships for that traffic.

Put all this together it appears that a lack of precipitation (rain and snow) and bad luck with shipping combined to create famine like conditions for at least Italy, Africa, and Judea for several years (perhaps anywhere between three and seven years) during the reign of Claudius. Given that Africa was the Empire’s breadbasket and the fact that grain was persistently in short supply in Rome itself, it seems reasonable to conclude that it would also be in short supply throughout much if not all of the Empire.

Tacitus and the New Testament Part 6

Thursday, February 5th, 2009

Herod the Great reigned in Judæa for 37 years from 41 BC to 4 BC. According to the Gospels of Matthew and Luke, Jesus was born during his reign (Matthew 2:1; Luke 1:5). According to the Gospel of Matthew, Herod ordered the young children in Bethlehem to be slaughtered when he found out about the birth of Jesus (Matthew 2:16).  Josephus summarizes his reign in Antiquities 17.8.1:

When he had done these things, he died, the fifth day after he had caused Antipater to be slain; having reigned, since he had procured Antigonus to be slain, thirty-four years; but since he had been declared king by the Romans, thirty-seven. A man he was of great barbarity towards all men equally, and a slave to his passion; but above the consideration of what was right; yet was he favored by fortune as much as any man ever was, for from a private man he became a king; and though he were encompassed with ten thousand dangers, he got clear of them all, and continued his life till a very old age. But then, as to the affairs of his family and children, in which indeed, according to his own opinion, he was also very fortunate, because he was able to conquer his enemies, yet, in my opinion, he was herein very unfortunate.

Tacitus’ mentions Herod in one section of his work:

The Histories 5.9:

The royal power, which had been bestowed by Antony on Herod, was augmented by the victorious Augustus. On Herod’s death, one Simon, without waiting for the approbation of the Emperor, usurped the title of king. He was punished by Quintilius Varus then governor of Syria, and the nation, with its liberties curtailed, was divided into three provinces under the sons of Herod.

Herod the Great willed his kingdom to three of his sons, Herod Archelaus, [Herod] Philip, and Herod Antipas as Josephus relates (Antiquities 17.8.1:):

And now Herod altered his testament upon the alteration of his mind; for he appointed Antipas, to whom he had before left the kingdom, to be tetrarch of Galilee and Perea, and granted the kingdom to Archclaus. He also gave Gaulonitis, and Trachonitis, and Paneas to Philip, who was his son, but own brother to Archclaus by the name of a tetrarchy; and bequeathed Jarnnia, and Ashdod, and Phasaelis to Salome his sister, with five hundred thousand [drachmae] of silver that was coined.

Herod Archelaus is only mentioned once in the New Testament in Matthew 2:22 where he is identified as the ruler of Judæa:

But when he [Joseph] heard that Archelaus was reigning over Judea instead of his father Herod, he was afraid to go there. And being warned by God in a dream, he turned aside into the region of Galilee.

According to Josephus, Joseph was right to fear Archelaus because soon after the death of Herod Archelaus had 3,000 people killed (Antiquities 17.9.3). Josephus also says the Archelaus was the ruler of Judea (Antiquities 17.11.4)

[Herod] Philip is mentioned once or four times in the Gospels (Luke 3:1 and possibly Matthew 14:3; Mark 6:17;  and Luke 3:19). The issue about who is being referred to in the latter three references surrounds who “Philip” is.  If it is Philip the Tetrarch (the Philip that Tacitus refers to) then either Mark and Matthew are incorrect in claiming that Herodias was formerly married to him or Josephus is incorrect in claiming that Herodias was formerly married to Herod II, the son of Herod the Great.  Another option is that Herod II was really called “Herod Philip.” And that Josephus is correct in calling him “Herod” and the Gospel writers are correct in calling him “Philip.”  Herod the Great’s family tree is very confusing, with people being called the same names numerous times, so it seems plausible that any of the above possibilities could be correct.

Herod Antipas is mentioned dozens of times in the Gospels. It was he who beheaded John the Baptist for criticizing his marriage with Herodias (Matthew 14; Mark 6; Luke 9), and according to Luke mocked Jesus before sending him back to Pontius Pilate (Luke 23). He is also mentioned once in Acts 4:27.

These three sons are mentioned by Tacitus, but not by name, in the previous quote:

The Histories 5.9

He was punished by Quintilius Varus then governor of Syria, and the nation, with its liberties curtailed, was divided into three provinces under the sons of Herod.