Archive for January, 2010

Hippolytus’ Commentary on Daniel update #11

Tuesday, January 26th, 2010

Lots going on so my editing has been in fits and starts the past couple weeks.  The following passage concerns Daniel’s interpretation of the statue/image which was seen by Nebuchadnezzar in Daniel chapter 2. His interpretation is of great interest because he interprets the iron legs of the statue to be the Romans who were ruling during his lifetime.  Next week I will post Hippolytus’ rather intriguing interpretation of the feet of the statue, in which he predicts what the coming kingdom or kingdoms will look like.

And so how can we not consider the ancient things which were prophesied by Daniel in Babylon and are now still being fulfilled in the world? For the image which was portrayed according to that time, encompassed the type of the kingdom of all the world. In which time the Babylonians then reigned, as being the golden head of the image. Then after them the Persians ruled for two hundred forty-five years as they are shown to be silver. After them the Greeks ruled, beginning from Alexander of Macedon, for three hundred years, as they are bronze. After them the Romans, who are the iron legs of the image, being strong as iron.

Hippolytus Commentary on Daniel Update #10

Tuesday, January 12th, 2010

I’ve finished the rough draft translation of Hippolytus’ Commentary on Daniel, which is about 50,000 words long.  Now I begin the process of editing the translation.  It has proved to be a good read and I’m glad that I have begun this project.  As I was reading the translation I noticed a passage that I had forgotten about, perhaps it refers to the Jewish attitude about the canonicity of the book of Susannah and alludes to why it was deemed apocryphal by some Christians.

And so the chiefs of the Jews now want to mutilate these things of the book of [Daniel? Susannah?], believing that these things did not happen in Babylon, because they were shamed by the Elders at that time,  failing to recognize the administration of the Spirit.

Next week I’ll start posting excerpts of Hippolytus’ interpretation of Daniel’s apocalyptic dreams.

Hippolytus’ Commentary on Daniel Part 9

Tuesday, January 5th, 2010

It has been a while since I have last updated, vacation can sometimes be more busy than regular workweeks.  Fortunately I’ve made great progress in the translation and will begin editing the rough draft in a few weeks.  Soon I will begin posting some excerpts on how Hippolytus interprets the prophetic dreams of Daniel.  For now however I would like to end the first post of the new year with what Hippolytus’ thought concerning the nature of the Church.

For neither is a mere place able to be a called the Church, nor a house which is built with stone and clay, nor a man himself able to call himself the Church.  For a house is destroyed and a man dies. And so, what is the Church?  The community of saints participating in truth.  Therefore unanimity and the way of the saints added together, this becomes the Church the spiritual House of God.

How beautiful and true his words are.